Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente
Universidad Autónoma Chapingo
Declaración de privacidad




Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente
Volume XVII, issue 2, May - August 2011


Blanca Estela Linzaga-Román; Gregorio Ángeles-Pérez; Cesario Catalán-Everástico; Patricia Hernández-de la Rosa

Received: 0000-00-00

Accepted: 0000-00-00

Available online: / pages.189-198


picture_as_pdfDownload cloudxml picture_as_pdf View Online
  • descriptionAbstract

    The aim of this study was to determine the population structure of Pachycereus weberi in Cañada del Zopilote (Buzzard Canyon), Guerrero, Mexico. An observation plot of 50 x 50 m (2,500 m²) was established and divided into quadrats of 10 x 10 m to facilitate the field survey. All P. weberi individuals with height ≥ 0.10 m were tagged, and their total height, diameter at breast height (dbh), and location by X and Y coordinates were recorded. In addition, all individuals of associated woody species with dbh ≥ 5 cm were tagged, identified and their diameter and coordinates within the plot recorded. We calculated the spatial distribution and correlation patterns of the P. weberi population divided into two developmental stages, juveniles and adults, using Ripley’s index. A total of 18 species associated with P. weberi were recorded. P. weberi attained the highest Index of Relative Importance Value with 41.1 %, followed by Acacia tenciifolia with 22.6 %. P. weberi individuals with total height greater than 8.5 m and diameters from 5 to 43.8 cm were recorded. The spatial distribution pattern was clumped for individuals in both juvenile and adult development stages. The spatial correlation showed a repulsion pattern at distances of 2 to 13 m between juvenile and adult P. weberi. The diameter distribution suggests an episodic recruitment behavior, with low recruitment rates in intermediate diameter classes between juveniles and adults.

    Keyworks: Pachycereus weberi, Ripley’s index, Index of Relative Importance Value, spatial distribution pattern, spatial correlation pattern
  • beenhereReferences
    • ÁLVAREZ, R.; GODÍNEZ-ÁLVAREZ, H.; GUZMÁN, U.; DÁVILA, P. 2004. Aspectos ecológicos de dos cactáceas mexicanas amenazadas: implicaciones para su conservación. Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México 75: 7-16.

    • ARIAS, S.; TERRAZAS, T. 2009. Taxonomic revision of Pachycereus (Cactaceae). Systematic Botany 34(1): 68-83.

    • ARRIAGA, L.; ESPINOZA, J. M.; AGUILAR, C.; MARTÍNEZ E.; GÓMEZ L.; LOA, E. (Coords.). 2000. Regiones terrestres prioritarias de México. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad. México.

    • AUGSPURGER, C. K.; KELLY, C. K. 1984. Pathogen mortality of tropical tree seedling: experimental studies of the effects of dispersal distance, seedling density, and light conditions. Oecologia 61: 211-217.

    • BACKEBERG, C. 1960. Die Cactaceae, Vol. 3. Gustav Fisher-Verlag, Jena, Germany.

    • BESAG, J. 1977. Contribution to the discussion on Dr. Ripley’s paper. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B (39): 193-195.

    • BESAG, J.; DIGGLE, P. J. 1977. Simple Monte Carlo tests for spatial pattern. Applied Statistics. 26: 327-333.

    • BRAVO. H. 1978. Las cactáceas de México. Vol. l. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. México, D. F. México. 743 p.

    • BRITTON, N. L.; ROSE, J. N. 1920. The Cactaceae. Vol, ll, 2a ed. Dover Publications, Inc. New York. USA. 241 p.

    • CLARK, D. A.; CLARK, D .B. 1984. Spacing dynamics of a tropical rain forest tree: evaluation of the Janzen-Connell model. The American Naturalist 124 (6): 769-788.

    • CONDIT, R.; HUBBELL, S. P.; FOSTER, R .B. 1994. Density-dependence in two understory tree species in a Neotropical forest. Ecology 75: 671-680.

    • CURTIS, J. T.; McINTOSH, R. P. 1951. An upland forest continuum in the pariré-forest border region of Wisconsin. Ecology 32:476-496.

    • DIGGLE, P. J. 1983. Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns. Academic Press, London, UK. 148 p.

    • GODÍNEZ-ÁLVAREZ, H. T.; VALVERDE, T.; ORTEGA-BAES, P. 2008. Demographic trends in the Cactaceae. Botanical Review 69(2): 173-203.

    • GRUBB, P. J. 1977. The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration Niche. Biological Review 52:107-145.

    • HUTCHINGS, M. J. 1997. The Structure of plant populations. En: Crawley MJ (ed) Plant Ecology: Blackwell Science. Oxford. UK. pp. 325-358.

    • JANZEN, D. H. 1970. Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. American Naturalist 104 (940):201-528.

    • LARREA-ALCAZAR, D. M.; MURILLO, J. J.; FIGUEREDO, C. J.; SORIANO, P. J. 2008. Spatial associations between two globose cacti and two dominant mimosoid bushes in a tropical semiarid enclave. Ecotropicos 21(2): 97-105.

    • LARREA-ALCÁZAR, D. M.; SORIANO, P. J. 2008. Columnar cacti-shrub relationships in an Andean semiarid valley in western Venezuela. Plant Ecology 196: 153-161.

    • LEIRANA-ALCOCER, J.; PARRA-TABLA, P. 1999. Factor affecting the distribution, abundance and seedling survival of Mammillaria gaumeri, and endemic cactus of coastal Yucatán, México. Journal of Arid Environments 41: 421-428.

    • LÓPEZ, R.; VALDIVIA, S.; SANJINÉS, N.; QUINTANA, de la, D. 2007. The role of nurse plants in the establishment of shrub seedlings in the semi-arid subtropical Andes. Oecologia 52: 779-790.

    • LOTWICK, H. W.; SILVERMAN, B. W. 1982. Methods for analyzing spatial processes of several types of points. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, London, Series B 44: 403-413.

    • MARRIOTT, F. H. C. 1979. Barnard’s Monte Carlo tests: how many simulations? Applied Statistics 28: 75-77.

    • MUELLER-DOMBOIS, D; ELLENBERG, H. 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. John Willey and Sons. New York. USA. 547 p.

    • NANAMI, S.; KAWAGUCHI, H.; YAMAKURA, T. 1999. Dioecy-induced spatial patterns of two codominant tree species, Podocarpus nagi and Neolitsea aciculata. Journal of Ecology 87: 678-687.

    • PIELOU, E. C. 1977. Mathematical ecology. John Wiley and Sons. New York. USA. 385 p.

    • REYES-OLIVAS, A.; GARCÍA-MOYA, E.; LÓPEZ-MATA, L. 2002. Cacti– shrub interactions in the coastal desert of northern Sinaloa, Mexico. Journal of Arid Environments (2002) 52: 431-445.

    • RIPLEY, B. D. 1977. Modelling spatial patterns (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B39: 172-212.

    • RZEDOWSKI, J. 1978. Vegetación de Mexico. Edit. Limusa. México, D.F. México. 432 p.

    • SILVERTON, J. 1987. Introduction to plant Population Ecology. Second edition. Longman Scientific and Technical. 229 p.

    • SILVERTOWN, J.; CHARLESWORTH, D. 2001. Introduction to plant population biology. Fourth edition. Blackwell Science. London, UK. 347 p.

    • VALIENTE-BANUET, A.; EZCURRA, E. 1991. Shade as a cause of association between the cactus Neobuxbaumia tetetzo and the nurse plant Mimosa luisana in the Tehuacán Valley, México. Journal of Ecology 79: 961-971.

    • ZENTENO-RUIZ, F. R.; LÓPEZ, R. P.; LARREA-ALCÁZAR, D. M. 2009. Patrones de distribución espacial de Parodia maassii (Heese) A. Berger (Cactaceae) en un semidesierto de los Andes subtropicales, la prepuna. Ecología en Bolivia 44(2): 17-26.

  • starCite article

    Linzaga-Román, B. E.,  Ángeles-Pérez, G., Catalán-Everástico, C., &  Hernández-de la Rosa, P. (2011).  SPATIAL STRUCTURE OF Pachycereus weberi (Coult.) Backeb. IN CAÑADA DEL ZOPILOTE, GUERRERO. Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente, XVII(2), 189-198.